Kittyfish spent last night try to break down my door to force me to accept the mouse that he'd caught for me.
I'm beginning to suspect that he doubts my own mouse catching skills and thinks I would starve if he wasn't dropping mice on the floor next to my bed.
Well... at least it's the floor and not my pillow. And at least that's one less mouse to scamper by and scare me at random times throughout the day. He certainly is doing his job!
Sometimes when I read reports on what parents need to do to do what's "best" for their child, I kind of find myself shaking my head. The latest study, which I ran across last night was about the evils of forward facing strollers. It basically says that because children face forward in most strollers, parents don't talk to them as much, and because parents don't talk to them as much, it's changing brain development and is harmful to the child.
In the end something is thrown in saying it's about a baby needing comfort when they're overwhelmed, next to a picture of a baby that's pretty young to be sitting upright in a stroller, in an upright stroller, and I actually think they might have done better taking that direction (for very small babies), but since most of the article (and studies from what is mentioned) is about children facing forward and the possibility that it damages language development, I find the claim that forward facing strollers are damaging to kids to be kind of silly.
I should probably start by saying I can't really speak to how tiny babies experience sitting forward facing in a stroller. None of the strollers we've had were supposed to be used with tiny babies. Patch pretty much lived in a moby wrap for the first six months of his life, and when we go on walks I keep using the carrier quite about that first year, gradually increasing the amount of time in a stroller as they get bigger. As the kids grow they're usually pretty excited to be in the stroller taking in their surroundings. They're seeing people and animals and cars go by and are happy to be getting out and about.
And I just don't see that damaging their brain or language development.
I can't help but think that the pressure placed on parents to make sure their children's brains are stimulated every single second of those first formative years is kind of ridiculous. You'd think that in past centuries mothers poured every moment of their days into paying attention to their children and did nothing else, when that simply wasn't the case.
I guess I just get tired of this whole push to spend every minute on worrying about how little brain's are developing, when the business of living, going out and about, playing inside and out, is exactly what those little brains need to be healthy. Sometimes that means talking and sometimes that means watching the world pass by and noticing a bird chirping in a tree of a bicyclist flying down the street.
I think that even if we had enough rooms for everyone to have their own, I would still have shared rooms, because watching them have "slumber parties" every night has been amazing.
Has anyone else found themselves so much more tempted by whatever they gave up for lent, this week? I found my brain trying to justify why it would be okay to drink a soda because "it's holy week" a couple of days ago. I resisted but... it was tough!
I don't think we're attempting going to the Good Friday service today... with the struggles we've been having at Mass lately and me getting faint and Mae desperate to go into the Church to praise God in her own little way, I think it would be too disastrous.
While taking a break from writing Quick Takes I checked in with the Today Show where I occasionally get a chance to watch a few clips to get my news for the morning. The story of the sherpas who lost their life on Mt Everest in an avalanche came up and I began to listen and then I heard this:
"No, I couldn't tell you the name of any of the sherpas who are up there. The biggest tragedy of this is that it's the very beginning of the season. And to lose this number of people at the very beginning of the season may be the end of the season here."
I'm actually pretty that this being the possible "end to the season" and that some very wealthy adventure seekers may not be able to live out their dreams of climbing Everest this year, isn't the biggest tragedy occurring here.
I agree that shared rooms are a very good thing. I also know that having my own room was not a bad thing either. The loss of the Sherpas is such a tragedy for their families!
ReplyDeleteI thought the exact same thing when I saw that Today Show interview. I'm hoping his words just didn't come out right, and that's really not the thought he meant to express!
ReplyDeleteMy worst "kids at church" experience EVER was a Good Friday service (maybe in 2011 or 2010) that I foolishly thought would be about the length of a Mass. Except for that it was closer to 2 hours and 15 minutes. I plan never to go back unless I have childcare for anyone under 7, or my youngest is 7 - whichever comes first. Same goes for Easter Vigil, except the age cutoff is 10. These are both wonderful services, but not very small-child friendly. Someday...
ReplyDeleteHave a blessed Triduum!
Yes, I share your observation that Lenten sacrifices have been far harder this week. Weird!
ReplyDeleteAlmost there, though, and take heart: all these little religious observations in the home do take root, and will be foundational later when the kids mature in their faith.